Terrell Neilly v The Queen (Bahamas)
The trial judge erred in admitting dock identification evidence without sufficient justification and failed to properly direct the jury on the dangers of such evidence; these errors rendered the conviction unsafe as the remaining evidence was equally consistent with the appellant being a receiver rather than a robber.
- Parties
- Appellant: Terrell Neilly; Respondent: The Queen
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 May 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Court of Appeal to Privy Council
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction quashed
- Legal Topics
- Identification Evidence, Dock Identification, Armed Robbery, Possession of Firearm, Receiving Stolen Property, Fair Trial, Jury Directions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Terrell Neilly
Appellant
The Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Court of Appeal to Privy Council
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in admitting dock identification evidence against the appellant
- 2 Whether the summing up to the jury on identification evidence was adequate
- 3 Whether the withdrawal of the receiving count from the jury affected the safety of the conviction
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge erred in admitting dock identification evidence without sufficient justification and failed to properly direct the jury on the dangers of such evidence; these errors rendered the conviction unsafe as the remaining evidence was equally consistent with the appellant being a receiver rather than a robber.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed
Orders
- Conviction for armed robbery quashed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment