R v Terrance David Bailey

R v Terrance David Bailey

The sentencing judge failed to apply a sufficient reduction for totality, resulting in a manifestly excessive sentence. The appellate court quashed the original sentence and imposed a reduced sentence reflecting both totality and personal mitigation.

Parties
Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Terrence David Bailey
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Sentence Appeal
Outcome
appeal allowed; sentence quashed and substituted
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Burglary, Totality Principle, Mitigation
Criminal Law Sentencing Burglary Totality Principle Mitigation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecutor

Terrence David Bailey

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Sentence Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive due to failure to apply the totality principle
  2. 2 Whether sufficient reduction was made for personal mitigation

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge failed to apply a sufficient reduction for totality, resulting in a manifestly excessive sentence. The appellate court quashed the original sentence and imposed a reduced sentence reflecting both totality and personal mitigation.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed; sentence quashed and substituted

Orders

  • Original sentence of 42 months' imprisonment quashed
  • Substituted sentence of 10 months' imprisonment on each count, to run consecutively, total 30 months' imprisonment