Keisner v Terrus Group Ltd [2006] EWHC 2765 (Ch) (07 November 2006)
The court found that Terrus Group Limited breached the share sale agreement by failing to pay deferred consideration into the designated deposit account as required, by making unauthorized withdrawals, and by including management charges and set-offs not agreed by all directors. The court also found that Mr Keisner was improperly excluded from his directorship and denied access to information. The breaches entitled Mr Keisner to specific performance of the agreement, restoration of withdrawn sums, and injunctive relief to prevent further breaches.
- Citation
- [2006] EWHC 2765 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Michael Anthony Keisner; Defendant: Terrus Group Limited; Claimant: Evolution Trading Group Limited; Defendant: Baris UK Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial/contractual Dispute / High Court Trial and Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in substantial part
- Legal Topics
- Share Sale Agreement, Deferred Consideration, Director's Duties, Specific Performance, Breach of Contract, Injunctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Anthony Keisner
Claimant
Terrus Group Limited
Defendant
Evolution Trading Group Limited
Claimant
Baris UK Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial/contractual Dispute / High Court Trial and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Terrus Group Limited breached the share sale agreement with Mr Keisner regarding deferred consideration and related obligations
- 2 Whether Mr Keisner was wrongfully excluded as a director and denied access to information
- 3 Whether the calculation and payment of deferred consideration was manipulated or breached by improper charges and withdrawals
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Terrus Group Limited breached the share sale agreement by failing to pay deferred consideration into the designated deposit account as required, by making unauthorized withdrawals, and by including management charges and set-offs not agreed by all directors. The court also found that Mr Keisner was improperly excluded from his directorship and denied access to information. The breaches entitled Mr Keisner to specific performance of the agreement, restoration of withdrawn sums, and injunctive relief to prevent further breaches.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in substantial part
Orders
- Specific performance of the share sale agreement requiring payment of deferred consideration into the designated deposit account
- Restoration of any sums withdrawn from the deposit account without consent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment