Marley v Rawlings & Anor
The will signed by Mr Rawlings was not valid because he did not intend by his signature to give effect to the will before him, but to another; section 9(b) of the Wills Act 1837 was not satisfied. Rectification under section 20 of the Administration of Justice Act 1982 was not available because the document was not a valid will.
- Parties
- Appellant: Terry Michael Marley; Respondent: Terry Rawlings; Respondent: Michael Rawlings
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Probate Appeal / Appeal From Chancery Division to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Formal Validity of Wills, Rectification of Wills, Testamentary Intention, Mistaken Execution of Wills
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Terry Michael Marley
Appellant
Terry Rawlings
Respondent
Michael Rawlings
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Probate Appeal / Appeal From Chancery Division to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a will signed by the testator but prepared for another person satisfies the formal requirements of the Wills Act 1837 section 9
- 2 Whether such a will can be rectified under section 20 of the Administration of Justice Act 1982
Ratio Decidendi
The will signed by Mr Rawlings was not valid because he did not intend by his signature to give effect to the will before him, but to another; section 9(b) of the Wills Act 1837 was not satisfied. Rectification under section 20 of the Administration of Justice Act 1982 was not available because the document was not a valid will.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; probate not granted to the will signed by Mr Rawlings; rectification refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment