Smith v Tesco Plc & Ors [2016] EWHC 3252 (QB) (16 December 2016)

Smith v Tesco Plc & Ors [2016] EWHC 3252 (QB) (16 December 2016)

The court found, on the balance of probabilities, that the claimant did sustain the accident as alleged and that the accident caused the sequestered disc and subsequent cauda equina syndrome. The alternative theory that the claimant was already in urinary retention before the accident was rejected as unsupported by...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] EWHC 3252 (QB)
Parties
Claimant: Julian Smith; Defendant: Tesco plc; Defendant: Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 December 2016
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury / Trial of Preliminary Issues
Outcome
Preliminary issues found in favour of the claimant
Legal Topics
Employer's Liability, Causation, Workplace Accident, Medical Negligence (not Determined in This Judgment)
Tort Law Personal Injury Employer's Liability Causation Workplace Accident Medical Negligence (not Determined in This Judgment)

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Julian Smith

Claimant

Tesco plc

Defendant

Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury / Trial of Preliminary Issues

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant sustained the accident in the circumstances alleged
  2. 2 Whether the alleged accident caused or materially contributed to the development of cauda equina syndrome

Ratio Decidendi

The court found, on the balance of probabilities, that the claimant did sustain the accident as alleged and that the accident caused the sequestered disc and subsequent cauda equina syndrome. The alternative theory that the claimant was already in urinary retention before the accident was rejected as unsupported by the evidence.

Court Disposition

Preliminary issues found in favour of the claimant

Orders

  • It is declared that the claimant sustained the accident in the circumstances alleged.
  • It is declared that the accident caused or materially contributed to the development of cauda equina syndrome.