Tesco Plc v Commissioners for Customs and Excise Rev 1
Vouchers issued under Tesco's Clubcard scheme and related third party schemes are not 'granted for a consideration' within the meaning of paragraph 5 of Schedule 6 to the Value Added Tax Act 1994 as interpreted in accordance with Community law. The price paid by customers for premium goods is the same for Clubcard and non-Clubcard members, and there is no direct link between any part of the price and the issue of vouchers. The economic and legal analysis, as required by Community law and relevant case law, demonstrates that the supply of vouchers is not for consideration, and thus Tesco's appeal fails.
- Parties
- Appellant: Tesco PLC; Respondents: The Commissioners for Customs and Excise
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 October 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court, Chancery Division
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Value Added Tax (vat), Vouchers and Consideration, Community Law Interpretation, Double Taxation, Promotional Schemes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tesco PLC
Appellant
The Commissioners for Customs and Excise
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court, Chancery Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether vouchers issued under Tesco's Clubcard scheme and related third party schemes are 'granted for a consideration' within the meaning of paragraph 5 of Schedule 6 to the Value Added Tax Act 1994, as interpreted in accordance with Community law.
- 2 Whether the right to receive goods up to the face value of a Clubcard voucher is granted for a consideration, such that VAT liability is affected.
Ratio Decidendi
Vouchers issued under Tesco's Clubcard scheme and related third party schemes are not 'granted for a consideration' within the meaning of paragraph 5 of Schedule 6 to the Value Added Tax Act 1994 as interpreted in accordance with Community law. The price paid by customers for premium goods is the same for Clubcard and non-Clubcard members, and there is no direct link between any part of the price and the issue of vouchers. The economic and legal analysis, as required by Community law and relevant case law, demonstrates that the supply of vouchers is not for consideration, and thus Tesco's appeal fails.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Tesco's appeal is dismissed.
- The Commissioners' cross-appeal is allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment