Abrew v Tesco Stores Ltd. [2003] EWHC 9003 (Costs) (16 May 2003)
The appropriate insurance premium was £400 based on the circumstances and market knowledge at the time; a 50% success fee was reasonable given the risks as perceived by the solicitor; the Costs Officer's assessment of detailed assessment costs should stand as the defendants' approach caused much of the additional...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2003] EWHC 9003 (Costs)
- Parties
- Claimant: Mrs Mary Abrew; Defendant: Tesco Stores Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Appeal / Appeal From Costs Officer's Assessment
- Outcome
- Defendants' appeal allowed in part (insurance premium reduced), dismissed in respect of success fee and detailed assessment costs.
- Legal Topics
- Insurance Premium Assessment, Success Fee Determination, Proportionality of Costs, Detailed Assessment Costs
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Mary Abrew
Claimant
Tesco Stores Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Costs Appeal / Appeal From Costs Officer's Assessment
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate level of insurance premium
- 2 Reasonable success fee percentage
- 3 Proportionality of costs for detailed assessment
Ratio Decidendi
The appropriate insurance premium was £400 based on the circumstances and market knowledge at the time; a 50% success fee was reasonable given the risks as perceived by the solicitor; the Costs Officer's assessment of detailed assessment costs should stand as the defendants' approach caused much of the additional costs.
Court Disposition
Defendants' appeal allowed in part (insurance premium reduced), dismissed in respect of success fee and detailed assessment costs.
Orders
- Insurance premium allowed at £400
- Success fee allowed at 50%
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment