TF v RF & Ors

TF v RF & Ors

Given the father's sustained abusive, threatening, and contemptuous behaviour, lack of insight, and the significant risk of abduction and emotional harm to the children, all direct contact must be suspended. The change of surname is justified to protect the children, and a section 91(14) order is necessary to prevent further disruptive litigation. The judge declined to recuse himself as no real possibility of bias was established.

Parties
Applicant: TF; 1st Respondent: RF; 2nd Respondent: DF; 3rd Respondent: NMF
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
02 November 2007
Procedural Posture
Family / Judgment After Contested Applications Regarding Residence, Contact, Change of Name, and Section 91(14) Order
Outcome
Applications by the mother for suspension of contact, change of surname, and section 91(14) order granted; all applications by the father dismissed; judge refused to recuse himself.
Legal Topics
Residence Orders, Contact Orders, Change of Name, Section 91(14) Children Act 1989, Harassment, Abduction Risk, Supervised Contact, Parental Responsibility
Family Law Child Law Residence Orders Contact Orders Change of Name Section 91(14) Children Act 1989 Harassment Abduction Risk +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

TF

Applicant

RF

1st Respondent

DF

2nd Respondent

NMF

3rd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family / Judgment After Contested Applications Regarding Residence, Contact, Change of Name, and Section 91(14) Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the father should have direct or supervised contact with the children
  2. 2 Whether the mother should be permitted to change the children's surnames
  3. 3 Whether a section 91(14) order restricting the father's applications should be made

Ratio Decidendi

Given the father's sustained abusive, threatening, and contemptuous behaviour, lack of insight, and the significant risk of abduction and emotional harm to the children, all direct contact must be suspended. The change of surname is justified to protect the children, and a section 91(14) order is necessary to prevent further disruptive litigation. The judge declined to recuse himself as no real possibility of bias was established.

Court Disposition

Applications by the mother for suspension of contact, change of surname, and section 91(14) order granted; all applications by the father dismissed; judge refused to recuse himself.

Orders

  • All direct contact between father and children suspended
  • Mother granted permission to change children's surnames for all purposes