TFW Printers Ltd v Interserve Project Services Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 875 (27 June 2006)
The obligation to insure under clause 6.3B of the JCT Minor Works Contract ceases upon practical completion because the contract language, structure, and commercial context indicate that insurance of the Works and unfixed materials is only required up to practical completion, after which the Employer alone bears the risk as building owner in possession. The contract does not provide machinery for insurance or variations after practical completion, and there is no rational basis for the insurance obligation to extend beyond that point.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 875
- Parties
- Appellant: TFW Printers Ltd; Respondent: Interserve Project Services Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Central London County Court, Preliminary Issues Tried
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Standard Form Contracts, Insurance Obligations in Building Contracts, Defects Liability Period, JCT Minor Works Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TFW Printers Ltd
Appellant
Interserve Project Services Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Central London County Court, Preliminary Issues Tried
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employer's obligation to insure under clause 6.3B of the JCT Minor Works Contract continues after practical completion until the end of the defects liability period
- 2 If the insurance obligation continues, whether clause 6.3B bars a claim by the Employer against the Contractor for damages for breach of contract and/or negligence
Ratio Decidendi
The obligation to insure under clause 6.3B of the JCT Minor Works Contract ceases upon practical completion because the contract language, structure, and commercial context indicate that insurance of the Works and unfixed materials is only required up to practical completion, after which the Employer alone bears the risk as building owner in possession. The contract does not provide machinery for insurance or variations after practical completion, and there is no rational basis for the insurance obligation to extend beyond that point.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Employer's obligation to insure under clause 6.3B ceases upon practical completion
- Employer's claim for damages is not barred by clause 6.3B
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment