Transport for Greater Manchester v Thales Transport & Security Ltd
Thales failed to discharge the burden of proving that the dominant purpose of the December 2011 Nichols Group report was for contemplated litigation; the evidence showed mixed purposes and lacked specificity, and the claim for litigation privilege was not made out.
- Parties
- Claimant: Transport for Greater Manchester (formerly Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive); Defendant: Thales Transport & Security Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 February 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (disclosure/privilege Dispute) / Post Judgment Application Regarding Litigation Privilege Over Specific Documents
- Outcome
- Claim for litigation privilege over the December 2011 Nichols Group report rejected.
- Legal Topics
- Litigation Privilege, Disclosure of Documents, Dominant Purpose Test, Legal Professional Privilege
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Transport for Greater Manchester (formerly Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive)
Claimant
Thales Transport & Security Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (disclosure/privilege Dispute) / Post Judgment Application Regarding Litigation Privilege Over Specific Documents
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the December 2011 Nichols Group report is protected by litigation privilege
- 2 Whether the dominant purpose of the report was for contemplated litigation
Ratio Decidendi
Thales failed to discharge the burden of proving that the dominant purpose of the December 2011 Nichols Group report was for contemplated litigation; the evidence showed mixed purposes and lacked specificity, and the claim for litigation privilege was not made out.
Court Disposition
Claim for litigation privilege over the December 2011 Nichols Group report rejected.
Orders
- Thales to disclose the December 2011 Nichols Group report no later than 11 February 2013.
- Any representations on costs and summary assessments to be submitted in writing by 8 February 2013.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment