Canal & River Trust v Thames Water Utilities Ltd
Thames Water's payment obligations for water abstracted from the River Lee are governed solely by the statutory regime, specifically the River Lee Water Act 1855 and subsequent amendments; no additional contractual, restitutionary, or unjust enrichment claims arise for water abstracted under licences of right, and the statutory licensing regime provides a complete defence to such claims.
- Parties
- Claimant: Canal & River Trust; Defendant: Thames Water Utilities Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Part 8 Claim / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim for additional payment beyond statutory Special Payments dismissed; statutory regime governs payment obligations.
- Legal Topics
- Water Abstraction, Statutory Payments, Licensing Regime, Implied Contract, Restitution, Unjust Enrichment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Canal & River Trust
Claimant
Thames Water Utilities Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Thames Water is required to make payments for water abstracted from the River Lee beyond statutory Special Payments
- 2 Whether any basis exists other than under the River Lee Water Act 1855 for Thames Water's payment obligations
- 3 Effect of the Water Resources Act 1963 and 1965 Order on payment obligations
Ratio Decidendi
Thames Water's payment obligations for water abstracted from the River Lee are governed solely by the statutory regime, specifically the River Lee Water Act 1855 and subsequent amendments; no additional contractual, restitutionary, or unjust enrichment claims arise for water abstracted under licences of right, and the statutory licensing regime provides a complete defence to such claims.
Court Disposition
Claim for additional payment beyond statutory Special Payments dismissed; statutory regime governs payment obligations.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment