SO, R (on the application of) v Thanet District Council
A local authority cannot lawfully give a section 77(1) direction to persons residing on land with its consent unless and until that consent has been withdrawn and reasonable notice of withdrawal has been given to those affected. The statutory scheme requires the state of affairs described in section 77(1) to exist at the time the direction is given, not as a result of giving the direction. Failure to give reasonable notice before issuing the direction renders it unlawful.
- Parties
- Claimant: SO; Defendant: Thanet District Council; Interested Party: Kent County Council; Interested Party: The Crown Estate; Interested Party: The Justices at Maidstone Magistrates' Court
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / First Instance (court of Appeal, Following Grant of Permission)
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; section 77(1) direction quashed.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Statutory Interpretation, Consent and Withdrawal of Consent, Procedural Fairness, Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 S.77
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SO
Claimant
Thanet District Council
Defendant
Kent County Council
Interested Party
The Crown Estate
Interested Party
The Justices at Maidstone Magistrates' Court
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / First Instance (court of Appeal, Following Grant of Permission)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a section 77(1) direction under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 can lawfully be given to persons residing on land with the consent of the occupier without prior notice of withdrawal of consent.
- 2 Whether Thanet District Council was required to give reasonable notice of withdrawal of consent before issuing a section 77(1) direction.
Ratio Decidendi
A local authority cannot lawfully give a section 77(1) direction to persons residing on land with its consent unless and until that consent has been withdrawn and reasonable notice of withdrawal has been given to those affected. The statutory scheme requires the state of affairs described in section 77(1) to exist at the time the direction is given, not as a result of giving the direction. Failure to give reasonable notice before issuing the direction renders it unlawful.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; section 77(1) direction quashed.
Orders
- Judicial review granted.
- Section 77(1) direction issued to SO and her family on 1 December 2021 quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment