The Best Connection Group Limited v The Commissioners for HMRC

The Best Connection Group Limited v The Commissioners for HMRC

The salary sacrifice was a valid contractual term. However, subsistence payments were round sum allowances due to systemic flaws and lack of causal link to actual expenses, while mileage and public transport payments were not round sum allowances but TBC must prove in each case that payments related to actual expenses. The dispensation did not apply to subsistence or public transport payments due to non-compliance with its terms. TBC did not exercise reasonable care and is not entitled to Regulation 72 relief. The 2013 Determination was likely made to best judgment, but final determination on this is deferred to the quantum stage.

Parties
Appellant: The Best Connection Group Limited; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed except to the extent TBC can prove specific mileage payments related to actual mileage incurred.
Legal Topics
Income Tax, National Insurance Contributions, Salary Sacrifice, PAYE Regulations, Dispensation, Round Sum Allowances, Employment Contracts
Tax Law Employment Law Contract Law Income Tax National Insurance Contributions Salary Sacrifice PAYE Regulations Dispensation +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Best Connection Group Limited

Appellant

The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the salary sacrifice arrangement was a valid contractual term despite lack of detail
  2. 2 Whether payments were round sum allowances due to insufficient causal link to expenses incurred
  3. 3 Whether payments related to actual mileage or expenses incurred

Ratio Decidendi

The salary sacrifice was a valid contractual term. However, subsistence payments were round sum allowances due to systemic flaws and lack of causal link to actual expenses, while mileage and public transport payments were not round sum allowances but TBC must prove in each case that payments related to actual expenses. The dispensation did not apply to subsistence or public transport payments due to non-compliance with its terms. TBC did not exercise reasonable care and is not entitled to Regulation 72 relief. The 2013 Determination was likely made to best judgment, but final determination on this is deferred to the quantum stage.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed except to the extent TBC can prove specific mileage payments related to actual mileage incurred.

Orders

  • TBC’s appeals are dismissed except for mileage payments where TBC can show actual mileage incurred.
  • No Regulation 72 PAYE relief is granted.