R C Pillar & Son v The Camber
The parties, by their pleadings and conduct, agreed to confer ad hoc jurisdiction on the adjudicator to determine all claims and cross-claims, waiving any jurisdictional or procedural objections. There was a contract sufficiently evidenced in writing to found adjudication, and the adjudicator's award is enforceable.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: R. C. Pillar & Son; Defendant: The Camber
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment on Application to Enforce Adjudicator's Award (summary Judgment)
- Outcome
- Summary judgment granted for the claimant.
- Legal Topics
- Adjudication Enforcement, Jurisdiction of Adjudicator, Written Contracts Under HGCRA, Summary Judgment, Withholding Notices
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R. C. Pillar & Son
Claimant
The Camber
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment on Application to Enforce Adjudicator's Award (summary Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was a contract sufficiently evidenced in writing to found adjudication under HGCRA
- 2 Whether the adjudicator had jurisdiction to determine the dispute
- 3 Whether the parties agreed to confer ad hoc jurisdiction on the adjudicator
Ratio Decidendi
The parties, by their pleadings and conduct, agreed to confer ad hoc jurisdiction on the adjudicator to determine all claims and cross-claims, waiving any jurisdictional or procedural objections. There was a contract sufficiently evidenced in writing to found adjudication, and the adjudicator's award is enforceable.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment granted for the claimant.
Orders
- Defendant to pay the sum awarded by the adjudicator (£46,000) to the claimant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment