Tumaye v The Central Criminal Court
The judge failed to make a judicial determination that the statutory criteria for extending custody time limits were met; therefore, the extension order cannot stand.
- Parties
- Claimant: Tumaye; Defendant: The Central Criminal Court
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Permission Application Restored and Treated as Substantive Hearing
- Outcome
- Order quashed
- Legal Topics
- Custody Time Limits, Bail Conditions, Due Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Tumaye
Claimant
The Central Criminal Court
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Permission Application Restored and Treated as Substantive Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge failed to engage with the statutory criteria under section 22(3) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 when extending custody time limits
- 2 Whether the extension of custody time limits was valid in the absence of the claimant and/or properly instructed counsel
Ratio Decidendi
The judge failed to make a judicial determination that the statutory criteria for extending custody time limits were met; therefore, the extension order cannot stand.
Court Disposition
Order quashed
Orders
- Order extending custody time limits made by Judge Roberts is quashed
- Bail conditions to be determined following submissions by parties
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment