Mark Widdows v The Coal Authority
The schedule of works produced on 13 October 2017, as amended on 30 October 2017, together with plans, photographs, and costings, fully satisfies the requirements of section 6(2) of the Coal Mining Subsidence Act 1991. The remedial action to be taken by The Coal Authority shall be as specified in that schedule.
- Parties
- Claimant: Mark Widdows; Respondent: The Coal Authority
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Compensation Mining Subsidence / Determination of Adequacy of Schedule of Remedial Works Under Section 6(2) of the Coal Mining Subsidence Act 1991
- Outcome
- Schedule of remedial works as amended on 30 October 2017 approved; remedial action to proceed as specified therein.
- Legal Topics
- Mining Subsidence, Remedial Works, Statutory Compensation, Schedule of Works, Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mark Widdows
Claimant
The Coal Authority
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Compensation Mining Subsidence / Determination of Adequacy of Schedule of Remedial Works Under Section 6(2) of the Coal Mining Subsidence Act 1991
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the schedule of remedial works served by The Coal Authority satisfies the requirements of section 6(2) of the Coal Mining Subsidence Act 1991
Ratio Decidendi
The schedule of works produced on 13 October 2017, as amended on 30 October 2017, together with plans, photographs, and costings, fully satisfies the requirements of section 6(2) of the Coal Mining Subsidence Act 1991. The remedial action to be taken by The Coal Authority shall be as specified in that schedule.
Court Disposition
Schedule of remedial works as amended on 30 October 2017 approved; remedial action to proceed as specified therein.
Orders
- The remedial action to be taken by The Coal Authority in relation to the property shall be that specified in the schedule of works in its amended form of 30 October 2017.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment