T-Mobile (UK) Ltd & Ors, R (on the application of) v Competition Commission & Anor

T-Mobile (UK) Ltd & Ors, R (on the application of) v Competition Commission & Anor

The court held that the Director-General and Competition Commission were entitled to impose price regulation on mobile call termination charges even absent a formal finding of Significant Market Power, under the relevant Directives and national law, particularly in exceptional circumstances. The imposition of a one-day price cap as a springboard for continued regulation was lawful and not disproportionate. The calculation of the fair charge and externality surcharge was reasoned and not irrational. The regulatory actions were consistent with Section 3(1) of the Telecommunications Act 1984, and the Commission and Director had adequately considered the operators' ability to finance their...

Parties
Claimant: T-Mobile (UK) Ltd; Claimant: Vodafone Ltd; Claimant: Orange Personal Communication Services Ltd; Defendant: The Competition Commission; Defendant: The Director-General of Telecommunications; Interested Party: 02; Interested Party: The Department of Trade and Industry
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
27 June 2003
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment After Substantive Hearing
Outcome
Applications for judicial review dismissed. Permission to apply for judicial review granted on all issues, but all claims dismissed on the merits.
Legal Topics
Price Regulation, Significant Market Power (smp), Transitional Regulatory Regimes, Judicial Review of Regulatory Decisions, Interpretation of EU Directives, Licence Modification, Cost Allocation and Pricing, Market Analysis Procedures
Telecommunications Law Competition Law Administrative Law European Union Law Price Regulation Significant Market Power (smp) Transitional Regulatory Regimes Judicial Review of Regulatory Decisions +4 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

T-Mobile (UK) Ltd

Claimant

Vodafone Ltd

Claimant

Orange Personal Communication Services Ltd

Claimant

The Competition Commission

Defendant

The Director-General of Telecommunications

Defendant

02

Interested Party

The Department of Trade and Industry

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Judgment After Substantive Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Director-General and Competition Commission could lawfully impose price controls on mobile call termination charges absent a finding of Significant Market Power (SMP)
  2. 2 Whether new or continued price regulation could be imposed during the transitional period between EU telecommunications regimes
  3. 3 Whether a one-day price cap was lawful and proportionate

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the Director-General and Competition Commission were entitled to impose price regulation on mobile call termination charges even absent a formal finding of Significant Market Power, under the relevant Directives and national law, particularly in exceptional circumstances. The imposition of a one-day price cap as a springboard for continued regulation was lawful and not disproportionate. The calculation of the fair charge and externality surcharge was reasoned and not irrational. The regulatory actions were consistent with Section 3(1) of the Telecommunications Act 1984, and the Commission and Director had adequately considered the operators' ability to finance their...

Court Disposition

Applications for judicial review dismissed. Permission to apply for judicial review granted on all issues, but all claims dismissed on the merits.

Orders

  • Applications for judicial review dismissed.
  • Costs awarded to the Competition Commission and Director-General of Telecommunications, to be paid by the claimants.