McKinney Plant & Safety Ltd v The Construction Industry Training Board
The Claimant breached PD 57AC in its witness statement, acknowledged non-compliance, and is permitted to file an amended statement subject to proper cross-referencing and provision of document lists; costs are awarded to the Defendant on the indemnity basis due to the seriousness of the breach and the Claimant's failure to engage.
- Parties
- Claimant: McKinney Plant & Safety Ltd; Defendant: The Construction Industry Training Board
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 September 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Pre Trial Review (ptr) and Procedural Order
- Outcome
- Claimant granted permission to file amended witness statement; Defendant awarded indemnity costs.
- Legal Topics
- Witness Statement Compliance, Relief From Sanctions, Costs Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
McKinney Plant & Safety Ltd
Claimant
The Construction Industry Training Board
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Pre Trial Review (ptr) and Procedural Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the supplemental witness statement (McKinney 2) complied with PD 57AC
- 2 Whether relief from sanctions should be granted for non-compliance
- 3 Whether costs should be awarded on the indemnity basis
Ratio Decidendi
The Claimant breached PD 57AC in its witness statement, acknowledged non-compliance, and is permitted to file an amended statement subject to proper cross-referencing and provision of document lists; costs are awarded to the Defendant on the indemnity basis due to the seriousness of the breach and the Claimant's failure to engage.
Court Disposition
Claimant granted permission to file amended witness statement; Defendant awarded indemnity costs.
Orders
- Claimant to file amended Supplemental Witness Statement of Michael McKinney (McKinney 2.1) by 21 September 2022, cross-referenced to all relied documents and with a list of documents referred to in preparation.
- Claimant to provide Defendant a comparison between McKinney 2 and McKinney 2.1, to be included in the trial bundle.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment