Lifestyles Equities C.V. & Anor v The Copyrights Group & Ors
The claimants failed to plead or establish a real prospect of success that the proposed additional defendants (D9, D10, D11, D12) acted outside their constitutional roles as directors or parent company, or were actively involved in the alleged infringing acts. Mere board membership, managerial accountability, or parent company status is insufficient for joint tortfeasor liability. The application to join the additional defendants is dismissed.
- Parties
- Claimant: Lifestyles Equities C. V.; Claimant: Lifestyle Licensing B. V.; Defendant: The Copyrights Group; Defendant: Nicholas Francis Durbridge; Defendant: Greenwich Polo Club, Inc; Defendant: PJB Brand Limited; Defendant: Makezo Limited; Defendant: George Chirsitides & Co EE; Defendant: Vison AP DWW-LLC; Defendant: Fibertex Mon IKE; Proposed Defendant: Vivendi Village SAS; Proposed Defendant: Corinne Marguerite Anastasie Bach; Proposed Defendant: Peggy Nadia Aline Bathias; Proposed Defendant: Simon John Gillham
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 June 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Intellectual Property / Interlocutory Application—joinder of Additional Defendants
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Joint Tortfeasorship, Director Liability, Parent Company Liability, Amendment of Pleadings, Joinder of Parties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lifestyles Equities C. V.
Claimant
Lifestyle Licensing B. V.
Claimant
The Copyrights Group
Defendant
Nicholas Francis Durbridge
Defendant
Greenwich Polo Club, Inc
Defendant
PJB Brand Limited
Defendant
Makezo Limited
Defendant
George Chirsitides & Co EE
Defendant
Vison AP DWW-LLC
Defendant
Fibertex Mon IKE
Defendant
Vivendi Village SAS
Proposed Defendant
Corinne Marguerite Anastasie Bach
Proposed Defendant
Peggy Nadia Aline Bathias
Proposed Defendant
Simon John Gillham
Proposed Defendant
Procedural Posture
Intellectual Property / Interlocutory Application—joinder of Additional Defendants
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether proposed additional defendants (D9, D10, D11, D12) should be joined as parties for alleged joint tortfeasorship in trade mark infringement
- 2 Whether directors and parent company can be liable as joint tortfeasors for acts done in their constitutional roles
Ratio Decidendi
The claimants failed to plead or establish a real prospect of success that the proposed additional defendants (D9, D10, D11, D12) acted outside their constitutional roles as directors or parent company, or were actively involved in the alleged infringing acts. Mere board membership, managerial accountability, or parent company status is insufficient for joint tortfeasor liability. The application to join the additional defendants is dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- Joinder application to add Vivendi Village SAS, Corinne Marguerite Anastasie Bach, Peggy Nadia Aline Bathias, and Simon John Gillham as defendants is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment