Hayle Town Council, R (on the application of) v The Cornwall Council
The Leader’s Decision to withdraw from the Loggans Moor roundabout upgrade was not so obviously material to the planning application as to require reconsideration before granting permission. The Officer’s Report and committee decision were based on the existing capacity of the highway network, and the planned upgrade was not a determinative factor. The claim fails as the new factor would not have realistically caused a different outcome.
- Parties
- Claimant: Hayle Town Council; Defendant: The Cornwall Council; 1st Interested Party: Burrington Estates (Hayle) Ltd; 2nd Interested Party: Progress Land (Hayle 3) Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for judicial review dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Material Considerations in Planning Decisions, Delegated Authority in Planning, Judicial Review of Planning Permissions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hayle Town Council
Claimant
The Cornwall Council
Defendant
Burrington Estates (Hayle) Ltd
1st Interested Party
Progress Land (Hayle 3) Ltd
2nd Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Leader’s Decision to withdraw from the Loggans Moor roundabout upgrade was a new factor so obviously material that it should have been taken into account before granting planning permission
- 2 Whether, had the Leader’s Decision been taken into account, the outcome for the claimant would have been substantially different
- 3 Whether the officer granting permission was or ought reasonably to have been aware of the Leader’s Decision
Ratio Decidendi
The Leader’s Decision to withdraw from the Loggans Moor roundabout upgrade was not so obviously material to the planning application as to require reconsideration before granting permission. The Officer’s Report and committee decision were based on the existing capacity of the highway network, and the planned upgrade was not a determinative factor. The claim fails as the new factor would not have realistically caused a different outcome.
Court Disposition
Application for judicial review dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment