HM Inspector of Taxes v Billings & Ors [2000] EWCA Civ 309 (7 December 2000)
Section 291(8) of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 attributes to each taxpayer the rights and powers of their associates for the purposes of the section, resulting in each being treated as possessing more than 30% of the company's share capital. Therefore, all taxpayers were 'connected with' the company and disqualified from BES tax relief.
- Citation
- [2000] EWCA Civ 309
- Parties
- Appellant: The Crown; Respondents: Andrew Billings and six other taxpayers
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed
- Legal Topics
- Business Expansion Scheme (bes), Income Tax Relief, Statutory Construction, Connected Persons, Attribution of Rights, Associates Under Tax Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Crown
Appellant
Andrew Billings and six other taxpayers
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the taxpayers were 'connected with' the company under section 291 of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 and thus disqualified from BES tax relief due to the attribution of associates' rights under section 291(8).
Ratio Decidendi
Section 291(8) of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 attributes to each taxpayer the rights and powers of their associates for the purposes of the section, resulting in each being treated as possessing more than 30% of the company's share capital. Therefore, all taxpayers were 'connected with' the company and disqualified from BES tax relief.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed
Orders
- Order of Laddie J set aside
- Tax relief under section 289(1) of the 1988 Act refused to the taxpayers
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment