Mullen & Anor, R v [2000] EWCA Crim 36 (5th May, 2000)

Mullen & Anor, R v [2000] EWCA Crim 36 (5th May, 2000)

The use of handcuffs during Mullen's trial did not render the conviction unsafe as the judge acted within his discretion and took steps to minimise prejudice. Brooks' evidence, despite inconsistencies, was for the jury to assess and was sufficiently corroborated. The trial judge's refusal to recuse himself was not improper. The sentences imposed were manifestly excessive and reduced to fifteen years for Mullen and thirteen years for Mustapha. The confiscation order was lawfully made based on the evidence of realisable assets. Costs were awarded for the successful part of the appeal against sentence.

Citation
[2000] EWCA Crim 36
Parties
Respondent: The Crown
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Conviction, Sentence, and Confiscation Order
Outcome
Mullen's appeal against conviction dismissed; sentence reduced from eighteen to fifteen years. Mustapha's sentence reduced from sixteen to thirteen years. Confiscation order against Mullen upheld. Costs awarded for the successful part of the appeal against sentence.
Legal Topics
Drug Trafficking, Sentencing, Confiscation Orders, Fair Trial, Judicial Recusal, Evidence Admissibility, Costs
Criminal Law Drug Trafficking Sentencing Confiscation Orders Fair Trial Judicial Recusal Evidence Admissibility Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 19
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Crown

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Conviction, Sentence, and Confiscation Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the use of handcuffs during trial rendered the conviction unsafe
  2. 2 Whether the evidence of Catherine Brooks was sufficiently reliable to support conviction
  3. 3 Whether the trial judge should have recused himself at retrial

Ratio Decidendi

The use of handcuffs during Mullen's trial did not render the conviction unsafe as the judge acted within his discretion and took steps to minimise prejudice. Brooks' evidence, despite inconsistencies, was for the jury to assess and was sufficiently corroborated. The trial judge's refusal to recuse himself was not improper. The sentences imposed were manifestly excessive and reduced to fifteen years for Mullen and thirteen years for Mustapha. The confiscation order was lawfully made based on the evidence of realisable assets. Costs were awarded for the successful part of the appeal against sentence.

Court Disposition

Mullen's appeal against conviction dismissed; sentence reduced from eighteen to fifteen years. Mustapha's sentence reduced from sixteen to thirteen years. Confiscation order against Mullen upheld. Costs awarded for the successful part of the appeal against sentence.

Orders

  • Mullen's sentence quashed and substituted with fifteen years imprisonment.
  • Mustapha's sentence quashed and substituted with thirteen years imprisonment.