O'Meally, R v

O'Meally, R v

The non-disclosed material, while relevant to the credibility of the complainant, would not have provided the appellant with a significant opportunity to undermine the evidence of the complainant or affected the safety of the convictions. The evidence against the appellant was strong and the jury was already aware of credibility issues. The failures in disclosure did not render the convictions unsafe.

Parties
Applicant: The Crown; Respondent/appellant: Benjamin Hezekiah O'Meally
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 May 2015
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Following Reference by the Criminal Cases Review Commission Under Section 9 Criminal Appeal Act 1995
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; convictions upheld
Legal Topics
Non Disclosure, Rape, Credibility of Witnesses, Disclosure Obligations, Appeal Procedure
Criminal Law Non Disclosure Rape Credibility of Witnesses Disclosure Obligations Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Crown

Applicant

Benjamin Hezekiah O'Meally

Respondent/appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Following Reference by the Criminal Cases Review Commission Under Section 9 Criminal Appeal Act 1995

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether non-disclosure of material by the prosecution rendered the conviction unsafe
  2. 2 Whether undisclosed material relating to the complainant's credibility would have affected the verdicts
  3. 3 Whether the prosecution's failure to disclose telephone records and social services material undermined the fairness of the trial

Ratio Decidendi

The non-disclosed material, while relevant to the credibility of the complainant, would not have provided the appellant with a significant opportunity to undermine the evidence of the complainant or affected the safety of the convictions. The evidence against the appellant was strong and the jury was already aware of credibility issues. The failures in disclosure did not render the convictions unsafe.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; convictions upheld

Orders

  • Respondent to file final written submissions on sentence by 4 pm Friday 29 May 2015
  • Appellant to file final written submissions on sentence by 4 pm Friday 5 June 2015