R v BOB & Ors
The trial judge's ruling to exclude the hearsay statements was wrong and unreasonable because he failed to properly consider the presence of independent supporting evidence, the largely agreed facts, and the ability of the jury to test and assess reliability. The judge also did not adequately address the...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: The Crown; Respondent: BOB; Respondent: BYY; Respondent: AEN; Respondent: BEK
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Trial Judge's Ruling on Admissibility of Hearsay Evidence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Hearsay Evidence, Admissibility of Evidence, Disclosure Obligations, Jury Directions
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Crown
Appellant
BOB
Respondent
BYY
Respondent
AEN
Respondent
BEK
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Trial Judge's Ruling on Admissibility of Hearsay Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in excluding hearsay statements of deceased witnesses as inadmissible
- 2 Whether the reliability of the hearsay statements could be properly tested and assessed by the jury
- 3 Whether the prosecution complied with disclosure obligations relevant to the admissibility of hearsay
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge's ruling to exclude the hearsay statements was wrong and unreasonable because he failed to properly consider the presence of independent supporting evidence, the largely agreed facts, and the ability of the jury to test and assess reliability. The judge also did not adequately address the prosecution's disclosure obligations or the statutory framework for hearsay. The hearsay statements are admissible and the appeal is allowed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The hearsay statements are admissible at trial.
- The trial will proceed before a different judge, who must consider the position under section 125 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 after all evidence is adduced.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment