Conservative and Unionist Party v Election Commissioner & Ors
The statutory scheme of the Representation of the People Act 1983 limits the circumstances in which costs can be ordered against non-parties to those expressly provided in the Act; once the election court has made its determination and certified it, it is functus officio and cannot entertain further applications for costs against non-parties.
- Parties
- Claimant: The Conservative and Unionist Party; Respondent: The Election Commissioner; Interested Party: Lydia Emelda Simmons; Interested Party: Slough Conservative Association
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Costs Orders, Jurisdiction of Election Court, Non Party Costs Liability, Functus Officio Doctrine
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Conservative and Unionist Party
Claimant
The Election Commissioner
Respondent
Lydia Emelda Simmons
Interested Party
Slough Conservative Association
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an order for costs can be made against a non-party to an election petition
- 2 Whether the Election Commissioner retains jurisdiction after certifying determination under the Representation of the People Act 1983
- 3 Whether the Commissioner should have recused himself due to perceived bias
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory scheme of the Representation of the People Act 1983 limits the circumstances in which costs can be ordered against non-parties to those expressly provided in the Act; once the election court has made its determination and certified it, it is functus officio and cannot entertain further applications for costs against non-parties.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment