Khan, R (on the application of) v The Election Commissioner for the Aston Ward
The naming of Zulfiqar Khan in the election court's report was set aside because the statutory notice required by section 160(1) of the Representation of the People Act 1983 was not given, depriving him of procedural fairness. The other applications for judicial review were refused due to delay, lack of merit, and...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Zulfiqar Khan; Respondent: The Election Commissioner; Interested Party: The Returning Officer; Claimant: Jahan; Claimant: Kazi; Claimant: Islam; Interested Party: Petitioner (People's Justice Party)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment on Applications for Leave and Substantive Review
- Outcome
- Zulfiqar Khan's application allowed; naming in the report set aside. All other applications refused.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Election Petitions, Procedural Fairness, Notice Requirements, Costs, Delay in Judicial Review, European Convention on Human Rights
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zulfiqar Khan
Claimant
The Election Commissioner
Respondent
The Returning Officer
Interested Party
Jahan
Claimant
Kazi
Claimant
Islam
Claimant
Petitioner (People's Justice Party)
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment on Applications for Leave and Substantive Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Election Commissioner complied with statutory notice requirements before naming non-party individuals as guilty of corrupt or illegal practices under section 160(1) of the Representation of the People Act 1983
- 2 Whether refusal to adjourn the election petition hearing denied a fair hearing to the Labour Party respondents
- 3 Whether delay in bringing judicial review applications was fatal to the claims
Ratio Decidendi
The naming of Zulfiqar Khan in the election court's report was set aside because the statutory notice required by section 160(1) of the Representation of the People Act 1983 was not given, depriving him of procedural fairness. The other applications for judicial review were refused due to delay, lack of merit, and the applicants' choice not to participate in the original proceedings.
Court Disposition
Zulfiqar Khan's application allowed; naming in the report set aside. All other applications refused.
Orders
- Naming of Zulfiqar Khan in the election court's report set aside.
- No order for costs in favour of Zulfiqar Khan against the respondent or Central Funds.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment