Timothy Charles Harris & Anor. v The Environment Agency & Anor.
The claimants are entitled to an effective remedy for the Environment Agency's unlawful conduct. The appropriate remedy is a mandatory order requiring the Agency to formulate and disclose to the claimants, within 8 weeks, a plan detailing the measures it intends to take to comply with Article 6(2) of the Habitats Directive, including indicative timelines and, so far as practicable, the scientific and technical basis for those measures. The court will not require implementation or publication of the plan, nor grant liberty to apply, as these steps are unnecessary for an effective remedy and would improperly involve the court in ongoing supervision.
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr Timothy Charles Harris; Claimant: Mrs Angelika Harris; Defendant: The Environment Agency; Interested Party: Natural England
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Remedy Judgment Following Substantive Judgment
- Outcome
- Mandatory order granted
- Legal Topics
- Habitats Directive, Remedies in Judicial Review, Public Authority Duties, Effective Remedy, Water Abstraction, Special Area of Conservation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Timothy Charles Harris
Claimant
Mrs Angelika Harris
Claimant
The Environment Agency
Defendant
Natural England
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Remedy Judgment Following Substantive Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a mandatory order should be made against the Environment Agency to ensure compliance with Article 6(2) of the Habitats Directive
- 2 What form an effective remedy should take in light of the Agency's unlawful conduct
Ratio Decidendi
The claimants are entitled to an effective remedy for the Environment Agency's unlawful conduct. The appropriate remedy is a mandatory order requiring the Agency to formulate and disclose to the claimants, within 8 weeks, a plan detailing the measures it intends to take to comply with Article 6(2) of the Habitats Directive, including indicative timelines and, so far as practicable, the scientific and technical basis for those measures. The court will not require implementation or publication of the plan, nor grant liberty to apply, as these steps are unnecessary for an effective remedy and would improperly involve the court in ongoing supervision.
Court Disposition
Mandatory order granted
Orders
- The Environment Agency must, by 4pm on 7 December 2022, provide to the claimants details of the measures it intends to take to comply with its duties under Article 6(2) of the Habitats Directive in respect of The Broads Special Area of Conservation, including indicative timelines and, so far as practicable, the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment