Alliance Spring Co Ltd. & Ors v The First Secretary of State

Alliance Spring Co Ltd. & Ors v The First Secretary of State

The Secretary of State was entitled to conclude that the main purpose and effect of the scheme was comprehensive regeneration, not merely the provision of a new stadium for Arsenal Football Club. The CPO was justified in the public interest, proportionate, and all relevant legal requirements were met. The claimants' Convention rights were properly considered and not breached. The claim disclosed no error of law and must be dismissed.

Parties
Claimant: The Alliance Spring Co Ltd & Others; Defendant: The First Secretary of State; Interested Party: Islington Council (First Interested Party); Interested Party: Arsenal Football Club (Second Interested Party)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 January 2005
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment on Application to Quash Compulsory Purchase Order
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Compulsory Purchase, Planning Permission, Regeneration Schemes, Proportionality, European Convention on Human Rights
Administrative Law Planning Law Human Rights Law Compulsory Purchase Planning Permission Regeneration Schemes Proportionality European Convention on Human Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Alliance Spring Co Ltd & Others

Claimant

The First Secretary of State

Defendant

Islington Council (First Interested Party)

Interested Party

Arsenal Football Club (Second Interested Party)

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Judgment on Application to Quash Compulsory Purchase Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Compulsory Purchase Order (CPO) was lawfully confirmed by the Secretary of State
  2. 2 Whether the purpose of the CPO was a comprehensive regeneration scheme or primarily to benefit Arsenal Football Club
  3. 3 Whether the interference with the claimants' property rights was proportionate and justified under Article 1 of the First Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights

Ratio Decidendi

The Secretary of State was entitled to conclude that the main purpose and effect of the scheme was comprehensive regeneration, not merely the provision of a new stadium for Arsenal Football Club. The CPO was justified in the public interest, proportionate, and all relevant legal requirements were met. The claimants' Convention rights were properly considered and not breached. The claim disclosed no error of law and must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • The claim to quash the Compulsory Purchase Order is dismissed.