Tomanovic & Ors v The Foreign And Commonwealth Office [2019] EWHC 3350 (QB) (05 December 2019)
The claimants have no real prospect of establishing that the FCO exercised direction or control over Mr Ratel in his prosecutorial functions, nor that the claimants or their relatives were within the UK's jurisdiction for ECHR purposes. The acts complained of are not attributable to the UK, and the Human Rights Act 1998 does not apply to deaths/disappearances before 2 October 2000. There is no other compelling reason for the case to proceed to trial. Summary judgment is granted for the FCO.
- Citation
- [2019] EWHC 3350
- Parties
- Claimant: Verica Tomanovic; Claimant: Snezana Milenkovic; Claimant: Vesna Kontic; Claimant: Danijela Todorovic; Claimant: Olga Milovanovic; Claimant: Zlata Veselinovic; Claimant: Zivorad Jovanovic; Claimant: Marika Peric; Defendant: The Foreign and Commonwealth Office
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Claim Under Human Rights Act 1998 / Summary Judgment Application
- Outcome
- Summary judgment for the defendant; claim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- State Liability for Acts of Seconded Officials, Jurisdiction Under ECHR Article 1, Immunity of International Mission Personnel, Procedural Obligations Under ECHR Articles 2 and 3, Summary Judgment Standards
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Verica Tomanovic
Claimant
Snezana Milenkovic
Claimant
Vesna Kontic
Claimant
Danijela Todorovic
Claimant
Olga Milovanovic
Claimant
Zlata Veselinovic
Claimant
Zivorad Jovanovic
Claimant
Marika Peric
Claimant
The Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim Under Human Rights Act 1998 / Summary Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the UK (FCO) is liable under the Human Rights Act 1998 for alleged failures by a seconded prosecutor in Kosovo to investigate deaths and abductions
- 2 Whether the claimants were within the UK's jurisdiction for ECHR purposes
- 3 Whether immunity applies to the acts of the prosecutor or the FCO
Ratio Decidendi
The claimants have no real prospect of establishing that the FCO exercised direction or control over Mr Ratel in his prosecutorial functions, nor that the claimants or their relatives were within the UK's jurisdiction for ECHR purposes. The acts complained of are not attributable to the UK, and the Human Rights Act 1998 does not apply to deaths/disappearances before 2 October 2000. There is no other compelling reason for the case to proceed to trial. Summary judgment is granted for the FCO.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment for the defendant; claim dismissed.
Orders
- Claim dismissed in its entirety against the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment