The Friendly Trust's Bulk Application [2016] EWCOP 40 (29 July 2016)
A not-for-profit organisation deputy is not entitled to charge fixed costs at the solicitor's rate under Practice Direction PD19B unless specifically authorised by the court in each case. The court will not make a bulk order authorising such charges retrospectively or for future cases, as this would be inconsistent...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] EWCOP 40
- Parties
- Applicant: The Friendly Trust
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Court of Protection Property and Affairs Deputyship Application / Interim Judgment on Bulk Application for Costs Orders
- Outcome
- Bulk application for general authority to charge solicitor's fixed costs refused; routine administrative amendments to deputy orders permitted.
- Legal Topics
- Deputyship Remuneration, Fixed Costs Practice Direction, Retrospective Authority, Not for Profit Deputy Charges, Notification Requirements, Best Interests of Protected Persons
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Friendly Trust
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Court of Protection Property and Affairs Deputyship Application / Interim Judgment on Bulk Application for Costs Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a not-for-profit organisation deputy is entitled to charge fixed costs at the solicitor's rate under Practice Direction PD19B
- 2 Whether a bulk order can be made authorising retrospective and future charges at the solicitor's rate for all existing and future deputyships
- 3 Whether affected persons must be notified of such an application
Ratio Decidendi
A not-for-profit organisation deputy is not entitled to charge fixed costs at the solicitor's rate under Practice Direction PD19B unless specifically authorised by the court in each case. The court will not make a bulk order authorising such charges retrospectively or for future cases, as this would be inconsistent with the exercise of discretion, the need for notification to affected persons, and the requirement for evidence justifying higher remuneration. The Friendly Trust's application for a general bulk order is refused; remuneration must be determined on a case-by-case basis.
Court Disposition
Bulk application for general authority to charge solicitor's fixed costs refused; routine administrative amendments to deputy orders permitted.
Orders
- Authorised court officer to amend existing orders to record the deputy as 'The postholder of Co-ordinator of The Friendly Trust' or similar wording for administrative convenience.
- No bulk order authorising retrospective or future charges at solicitor's fixed costs rate granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment