CAMELOT UK LOTTERIES LIMITED v THE GAMBLING COMMISSION
Damages would be an adequate remedy for Camelot and IGT if the suspension were lifted and they succeeded at trial; damages would not be adequate for the Commission if the suspension were maintained and it succeeded at trial due to unquantifiable public interest losses; the balance of convenience lies in lifting the automatic suspension to allow the Commission to proceed with the Fourth Licence award to Allwyn.
- Parties
- Claimant: Camelot UK Lotteries Limited; Claimant: Camelot Global Lottery Solutions Limited; Claimant: International Game Technology PLC; Claimant: IGT Global Services Limited; Claimant: IGT Global Solutions Corporation; Claimant: IGT (UK 3) Limited; Claimant: IGT UK Interactive Limited; Claimant: IGT UK Limited; Defendant: The Gambling Commission; Interested Party: Allwyn Entertainment Limited; Interested Party: Sazka Group AS
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Procurement Challenge / Interlocutory Application to Lift Automatic Suspension
- Outcome
- Automatic suspension lifted; Commission permitted to proceed with contract award.
- Legal Topics
- Automatic Suspension, Adequacy of Damages, Balance of Convenience, Standing in Procurement Challenges, Limitation Period, Remedies Directive, National Lottery Licensing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Camelot UK Lotteries Limited
Claimant
Camelot Global Lottery Solutions Limited
Claimant
International Game Technology PLC
Claimant
IGT Global Services Limited
Claimant
IGT Global Solutions Corporation
Claimant
IGT (UK 3) Limited
Claimant
IGT UK Interactive Limited
Claimant
IGT UK Limited
Claimant
The Gambling Commission
Defendant
Allwyn Entertainment Limited
Interested Party
Sazka Group AS
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Procurement Challenge / Interlocutory Application to Lift Automatic Suspension
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the automatic suspension on contract award should be lifted pending trial of procurement challenges
- 2 Whether damages would be an adequate remedy for claimants if suspension is lifted and they succeed at trial
- 3 Whether damages would be an adequate remedy for the defendant if suspension is maintained and it succeeds at trial
Ratio Decidendi
Damages would be an adequate remedy for Camelot and IGT if the suspension were lifted and they succeeded at trial; damages would not be adequate for the Commission if the suspension were maintained and it succeeded at trial due to unquantifiable public interest losses; the balance of convenience lies in lifting the automatic suspension to allow the Commission to proceed with the Fourth Licence award to Allwyn.
Court Disposition
Automatic suspension lifted; Commission permitted to proceed with contract award.
Orders
- Automatic suspension under Regulation 56 of the Concession Contracts Regulations 2016 is lifted.
- The Commission is permitted to enter into the Enabling Agreement with Allwyn and subsequently award the Fourth Licence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment