The New Lottery Company Ltd & Anor v The Gambling Commission [2025] EWHC 1710 (TCC) (07 July 2025)
The court held that Allwyn, by virtue of its extensive involvement and the filing of a statement of case, should be treated as a party for the purposes of specific disclosure under CPR r.31.12 in respect of the contested categories. Orders were made for Allwyn to provide witness statements exhibiting adverse documents and to disclose specific documents if not produced by the Defendant. For Rothschild, the court found the test for non-party disclosure under CPR r.31.17 was met for certain categories, given gaps in the Defendant's disclosure and the relevance of Rothschild's documents to the conflict of interest issue.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 1710 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: The New Lottery Company Limited; Claimant: Northern & Shell Plc; Defendant: The Gambling Commission; Interested Party: Allwyn Entertainment Limited; Interested Party: Allwyn International AG; Interested Party: Camelot UK Lotteries Limited; Respondent: N. M. Rothschild & Sons Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Procurement Challenge and Related Disclosure Applications / Interlocutory Applications for Disclosure Orders
- Outcome
- Applications granted in part; specific disclosure orders made against Allwyn and Rothschild as set out in the judgment; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure of Documents, Non Party Disclosure, Interested Party Status, Conflicts of Interest, Modification of Contracts, Equal Treatment of Bidders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The New Lottery Company Limited
Claimant
Northern & Shell Plc
Claimant
The Gambling Commission
Defendant
Allwyn Entertainment Limited
Interested Party
Allwyn International AG
Interested Party
Camelot UK Lotteries Limited
Interested Party
N. M. Rothschild & Sons Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Procurement Challenge and Related Disclosure Applications / Interlocutory Applications for Disclosure Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an interested party in procurement litigation can be treated as a 'party' for the purposes of disclosure under CPR r.31.12
- 2 Whether the requirements for non-party disclosure under CPR r.31.17 are met against Rothschild
- 3 Whether specific categories of documents should be disclosed by Allwyn and Rothschild
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that Allwyn, by virtue of its extensive involvement and the filing of a statement of case, should be treated as a party for the purposes of specific disclosure under CPR r.31.12 in respect of the contested categories. Orders were made for Allwyn to provide witness statements exhibiting adverse documents and to disclose specific documents if not produced by the Defendant. For Rothschild, the court found the test for non-party disclosure under CPR r.31.17 was met for certain categories, given gaps in the Defendant's disclosure and the relevance of Rothschild's documents to the conflict of interest issue.
Court Disposition
Applications granted in part; specific disclosure orders made against Allwyn and Rothschild as set out in the judgment; costs reserved.
Orders
- Allwyn to provide witness statements exhibiting any known adverse documents for Categories 1-4, after consulting specified individuals.
- Allwyn to exhibit adverse documents in support of factual allegations in paragraphs 21(1) or 21(2)(b) of its Statement of Case (Category 5), after consulting specified individuals.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment