The New Lottery Company Limited & Anor v The Gambling Commission
Allwyn was treated as a party for the purpose of specific disclosure under CPR r.31.12 in relation to documents it relied upon or adverse documents within its knowledge, due to its active participation and pleadings. Disclosure orders were made against Allwyn for specific categories, subject to conditions. The applications for non-party disclosure against Rothschild were dismissed as the documents sought were not relevant to the pleaded case, would not support the Claimants' case or adversely affect the Defendant's case, and disclosure was not necessary for fair disposal of the claim.
- Parties
- Claimant: The New Lottery Company Limited; Claimant: Northern & Shell Plc; Defendant: The Gambling Commission; Interested Party: Allwyn Entertainment Limited; Interested Party: Allwyn International AG; Interested Party: Camelot UK Lotteries Limited; Respondent: N. M. Rothschild & Sons Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Procurement and Commercial Judicial Review / Interlocutory Application for Disclosure Orders
- Outcome
- Allwyn application allowed in part; Rothschild application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure of Documents, Status of Interested Parties, Conflicts of Interest, Modification of Contracts, Non Party Disclosure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The New Lottery Company Limited
Claimant
Northern & Shell Plc
Claimant
The Gambling Commission
Defendant
Allwyn Entertainment Limited
Interested Party
Allwyn International AG
Interested Party
Camelot UK Lotteries Limited
Interested Party
N. M. Rothschild & Sons Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Procurement and Commercial Judicial Review / Interlocutory Application for Disclosure Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an interested party should be treated as a 'party' for disclosure under CPR Part 31
- 2 Whether specific or non-party disclosure should be ordered against Allwyn and Rothschild
- 3 Whether documents sought are necessary and proportionate under CPR r.31.12 and r.31.17
Ratio Decidendi
Allwyn was treated as a party for the purpose of specific disclosure under CPR r.31.12 in relation to documents it relied upon or adverse documents within its knowledge, due to its active participation and pleadings. Disclosure orders were made against Allwyn for specific categories, subject to conditions. The applications for non-party disclosure against Rothschild were dismissed as the documents sought were not relevant to the pleaded case, would not support the Claimants' case or adversely affect the Defendant's case, and disclosure was not necessary for fair disposal of the claim.
Court Disposition
Allwyn application allowed in part; Rothschild application dismissed
Orders
- Allwyn to provide witness statements exhibiting known adverse documents for Categories 1-4, 5 (conditional), 6 (conditional), and 7 (conditional) as specified.
- Application against Allwyn for Categories 8-10 dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment