The New Lottery Company Limited & Anor v The Gambling Commission
Permission to use inadvertently disclosed privileged documents depends on whether it should have been obvious to a reasonable solicitor that the disclosure was a mistake. Where documents were not obviously privileged, or the mistake was not obvious, permission is granted. Where documents were clearly privileged, marked as such, or contained legal advice, and the mistake should have been obvious, permission is refused. The court applied the Al Fayed principles, considering the nature of the documents, the disclosure process, the involvement of lawyers, inconsistent redactions, and the context of agreed disclosure issues.
- Parties
- Claimant: The New Lottery Company Limited; Claimant: Northern and Shell PLC; Defendant: The Gambling Commission; Interested Party: Allwyn Entertainment Limited; Interested Party: Allwyn International AG; Interested Party: Camelot UK Lotteries Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 June 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Ruling on Use of Inadvertently Disclosed Privileged Documents
- Outcome
- Mixed: Permission granted for claimants to use some inadvertently disclosed documents; permission refused for others where mistake was obvious.
- Legal Topics
- Privilege, Disclosure, Concession Contracts Regulations, Legal Advice Privilege, Litigation Privilege, Inadvertent Disclosure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The New Lottery Company Limited
Claimant
Northern and Shell PLC
Claimant
The Gambling Commission
Defendant
Allwyn Entertainment Limited
Interested Party
Allwyn International AG
Interested Party
Camelot UK Lotteries Limited
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Ruling on Use of Inadvertently Disclosed Privileged Documents
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimants may use documents inadvertently disclosed by the defendant over which privilege is claimed
- 2 Whether the disclosure was an obvious mistake under CPR 31.20
- 3 Application of legal advice privilege and litigation privilege
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to use inadvertently disclosed privileged documents depends on whether it should have been obvious to a reasonable solicitor that the disclosure was a mistake. Where documents were not obviously privileged, or the mistake was not obvious, permission is granted. Where documents were clearly privileged, marked as such, or contained legal advice, and the mistake should have been obvious, permission is refused. The court applied the Al Fayed principles, considering the nature of the documents, the disclosure process, the involvement of lawyers, inconsistent redactions, and the context of agreed disclosure issues.
Court Disposition
Mixed: Permission granted for claimants to use some inadvertently disclosed documents; permission refused for others where mistake was obvious.
Orders
- Claimants may use documents where mistake was not obvious to a reasonable solicitor.
- Claimants may not use documents where mistake was obvious and privilege asserted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment