Pal v General Medical Council
The claimant's claims under the Data Protection Act, Human Rights Act, and in defamation raise triable issues and cannot be dismissed summarily; the defendants have not demonstrated that the claimant has no real prospect of success.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Dr Rita Pal; Defendant: The General Medical Council; Defendant: Catherine Green; Defendant: Peter Lynn; Defendant: Sarah Bedwell
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Summary Judgment Application
- Outcome
- Defendants' applications for summary judgment dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Data Retention, Article 8 ECHR, Summary Judgment, Defamation Meaning, Vicarious Liability
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr Rita Pal
Claimant
The General Medical Council
Defendant
Catherine Green
Defendant
Peter Lynn
Defendant
Sarah Bedwell
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Summary Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant's claims under the Data Protection Act 1998, Human Rights Act, and in defamation have a real prospect of success
- 2 Whether summary judgment should be granted to the defendants under CPR 24
- 3 Whether the retention of personal data by the GMC was lawful
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant's claims under the Data Protection Act, Human Rights Act, and in defamation raise triable issues and cannot be dismissed summarily; the defendants have not demonstrated that the claimant has no real prospect of success.
Court Disposition
Defendants' applications for summary judgment dismissed
Orders
- Claimant permitted to amend particulars of claim
- Claims to proceed to trial
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment