Mohammed v The Home Office

Mohammed v The Home Office

The three periods of immigration detention were unlawful, constituting three separate torts. Damages must be assessed for each period, taking into account the claimant's criminal history, the exacerbation of post-traumatic stress disorder, the harsher prison environment, and aggravating features including breach of rule 35 and failure to properly consider medical evidence. The total award is £78,500.

Parties
Claimant: Abdulrahman Mohammed; Defendant: The Home Office
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 November 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the claimant; damages awarded.
Legal Topics
False Imprisonment, Immigration Detention, Damages Assessment, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Rule 35 Procedure, Aggravated Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Abdulrahman Mohammed

Claimant

The Home Office

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the three periods of immigration detention were unlawful
  2. 2 Assessment of damages for false imprisonment
  3. 3 Impact of detention on mental health and family relationships

Ratio Decidendi

The three periods of immigration detention were unlawful, constituting three separate torts. Damages must be assessed for each period, taking into account the claimant's criminal history, the exacerbation of post-traumatic stress disorder, the harsher prison environment, and aggravating features including breach of rule 35 and failure to properly consider medical evidence. The total award is £78,500.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant; damages awarded.

Orders

  • The Home Office shall pay Abdulrahman Mohammed £78,500 in damages for false imprisonment.