Mohammed v The Home Office
The three periods of immigration detention were unlawful, constituting three separate torts. Damages must be assessed for each period, taking into account the claimant's criminal history, the exacerbation of post-traumatic stress disorder, the harsher prison environment, and aggravating features including breach of rule 35 and failure to properly consider medical evidence. The total award is £78,500.
- Parties
- Claimant: Abdulrahman Mohammed; Defendant: The Home Office
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimant; damages awarded.
- Legal Topics
- False Imprisonment, Immigration Detention, Damages Assessment, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Rule 35 Procedure, Aggravated Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abdulrahman Mohammed
Claimant
The Home Office
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the three periods of immigration detention were unlawful
- 2 Assessment of damages for false imprisonment
- 3 Impact of detention on mental health and family relationships
Ratio Decidendi
The three periods of immigration detention were unlawful, constituting three separate torts. Damages must be assessed for each period, taking into account the claimant's criminal history, the exacerbation of post-traumatic stress disorder, the harsher prison environment, and aggravating features including breach of rule 35 and failure to properly consider medical evidence. The total award is £78,500.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimant; damages awarded.
Orders
- The Home Office shall pay Abdulrahman Mohammed £78,500 in damages for false imprisonment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment