Secretary of State for Home Department, R (on the application of) v The Information Tribunal [2006] EWHC 2958 (Admin) (23 November 2006)
The Information Commissioner is entitled to challenge and appeal a ministerial certificate under section 28 of the Data Protection Act 1998 because the certificate directly affects his statutory powers and duties. The Secretary of State misdirected himself by excluding the Commissioner from the process, and the Tribunal was correct to quash the certificate.
- Citation
- [2006] EWHC 2958 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Secretary of State for the Home Department (SSHD); Respondent: The Information Tribunal; Interested Party: The Information Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / High Court Judgment on Application for Judicial Review of Information Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Data Protection Act 1998, National Security Exemptions, Ministerial Certificates, Information Commissioner's Powers, Judicial Review, Directive 95/46/ec
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Secretary of State for the Home Department (SSHD)
Claimant
The Information Tribunal
Respondent
The Information Commissioner
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / High Court Judgment on Application for Judicial Review of Information Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Information Commissioner has a statutory role in assessing national security exemptions under section 28 of the Data Protection Act 1998
- 2 Whether the Commissioner is 'directly affected' and entitled to appeal a ministerial certificate under section 28(4)
- 3 Whether the Secretary of State misdirected himself in issuing the certificate on the premise that the Commissioner had no statutory role
Ratio Decidendi
The Information Commissioner is entitled to challenge and appeal a ministerial certificate under section 28 of the Data Protection Act 1998 because the certificate directly affects his statutory powers and duties. The Secretary of State misdirected himself by excluding the Commissioner from the process, and the Tribunal was correct to quash the certificate.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The application for judicial review is dismissed.
- The section 28 certificate signed by the Secretary of State is quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment