The Christian Institute and others v The Lord Advocate
The information-sharing provisions of Part 4 of the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014 are not within the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament because they are incompatible with Article 8 ECHR, failing to be 'in accordance with the law' due to lack of clarity, accessibility, and safeguards, and may result in disproportionate interference with private and family life. The provisions do not relate to reserved matters (data protection) and are not incompatible with EU law beyond their incompatibility with Article 8 ECHR.
- Parties
- Appellants: The Christian Institute and others; Respondent: The Lord Advocate; Intervener: Community Law Advice Network
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Legislative Competence, Data Sharing, Privacy, Children's Rights, Family Life, Proportionality, Information Sharing, Confidentiality
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Christian Institute and others
Appellants
The Lord Advocate
Respondent
Community Law Advice Network
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Part 4 of the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014 is within the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament
- 2 Whether the Act's information-sharing provisions relate to reserved matters under the Scotland Act 1998
- 3 Whether the Act's provisions are compatible with Article 8 ECHR and EU law
Ratio Decidendi
The information-sharing provisions of Part 4 of the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014 are not within the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament because they are incompatible with Article 8 ECHR, failing to be 'in accordance with the law' due to lack of clarity, accessibility, and safeguards, and may result in disproportionate interference with private and family life. The provisions do not relate to reserved matters (data protection) and are not incompatible with EU law beyond their incompatibility with Article 8 ECHR.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The information-sharing provisions of Part 4 of the Act are not within legislative competence and cannot be brought into force.
- Parties invited to submit written submissions on the terms of a section 102 order within 42 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment