The Lord Chancellor v Detention Action
The Fast Track Rules 2014 are systemically unfair and unjust because the time limits are so tight that a significant number of asylum appellants are denied a fair opportunity to present their cases, and the procedural safeguards are insufficient to remedy this structural unfairness. Therefore, the FTR are ultra...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: The Lord Chancellor; Respondent: Detention Action; Interested Party: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Tribunal Procedure Rules, Ultra Vires, Fair Hearing, Asylum Appeals, Detained Fast Track System
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Lord Chancellor
Appellant
Detention Action
Respondent
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Fast Track Rules 2014 governing asylum appeals are ultra vires section 22 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 due to structural unfairness.
- 2 Whether the procedural safeguards in the Fast Track Rules are sufficient to ensure fairness and justice.
Ratio Decidendi
The Fast Track Rules 2014 are systemically unfair and unjust because the time limits are so tight that a significant number of asylum appellants are denied a fair opportunity to present their cases, and the procedural safeguards are insufficient to remedy this structural unfairness. Therefore, the FTR are ultra vires section 22(4) of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The Fast Track Rules 2014 are quashed as ultra vires section 22(4) of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment