The Metropolitan Police Service v Bile & Anor
There was insufficient evidence, on the balance of probability, that M was forced into marriage; all credible evidence indicated she married voluntarily. The court therefore had no power to make a forced marriage protection order or accept undertakings, and dismissed the application.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: The Metropolitan Police Service; First Respondent: Jama Mohamed Bile; Second Respondent: Marian Ahmed Hassan
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 July 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Forced Marriage Protection Order / Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Forced Marriage Protection Orders, Jurisdiction of Applicants, Hearsay Evidence, Costs Orders
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Metropolitan Police Service
Applicant
Jama Mohamed Bile
First Respondent
Marian Ahmed Hassan
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Forced Marriage Protection Order / Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has power to make a forced marriage protection order under section 63A of the Family Law Act 1996
- 2 Whether the Metropolitan Police Service was the appropriate applicant for leave to apply for a forced marriage protection order
- 3 Whether the evidence establishes that M was forced into marriage
Ratio Decidendi
There was insufficient evidence, on the balance of probability, that M was forced into marriage; all credible evidence indicated she married voluntarily. The court therefore had no power to make a forced marriage protection order or accept undertakings, and dismissed the application.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- All orders of continuing effect discharged
- Tipstaff directed to return passport and documents to the father
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment