W (Children)
The trial judge's refusal to permit relocation was plainly wrong. He failed to give sufficient weight to the devastating effect on the mother of refusal, did not properly balance the loss of contact with the father against the benefits of relocation, and did not apply the principles in Payne v Payne correctly. The welfare of the children, as the paramount consideration, required that the mother's application to relocate be granted.
- Parties
- Appellant: The mother; Respondent: The father
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Exeter County Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Child Relocation, Contact Orders, Parental Responsibility, Best Interests of the Child, Discretionary Appellate Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The mother
Appellant
The father
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Exeter County Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in refusing the mother's application to relocate to Australia with the children
- 2 Whether the judge misapplied the principles in Payne v Payne
- 3 Whether the judge's exercise of discretion was plainly wrong
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge's refusal to permit relocation was plainly wrong. He failed to give sufficient weight to the devastating effect on the mother of refusal, did not properly balance the loss of contact with the father against the benefits of relocation, and did not apply the principles in Payne v Payne correctly. The welfare of the children, as the paramount consideration, required that the mother's application to relocate be granted.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted
- Mother's application to relocate to Australia with the children allowed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment