David John Keighley, R (on the application of) v The Office of Communications
Ofcom and the BBC are correct that complaints about lack of due impartiality not directed at an individual programme or editorially linked series are outside Ofcom's enforcement jurisdiction under the Broadcasting Code; the Code requires due impartiality to be measured only at the level of individual programmes or editorially linked series, not across the service as a whole.
- Parties
- Claimant: David John Keighley; Defendant: The Office of Communications; Interested Party: British Broadcasting Corporation
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Broadcasting Code, Due Impartiality, Judicial Review, Regulatory Enforcement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David John Keighley
Claimant
The Office of Communications
Defendant
British Broadcasting Corporation
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Ofcom's Broadcasting Code requires due impartiality to be measured at the level of individual programmes or series, or across the service as a whole
- 2 Whether Ofcom's refusal to investigate complaints alleging systemic lack of due impartiality was lawful and reasonable
Ratio Decidendi
Ofcom and the BBC are correct that complaints about lack of due impartiality not directed at an individual programme or editorially linked series are outside Ofcom's enforcement jurisdiction under the Broadcasting Code; the Code requires due impartiality to be measured only at the level of individual programmes or editorially linked series, not across the service as a whole.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Claimant to pay Ofcom’s costs on the standard basis, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed.
- Claimant to pay BBC’s costs as Interested Party.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment