Star China Media Limited, R (on the application of) v The Office of Communications

Star China Media Limited, R (on the application of) v The Office of Communications

The penalty imposed by OFCOM was not disproportionate or unlawful; general deterrence justified the penalty even after licence revocation, and OFCOM’s assessment of seriousness, compliance history, and harm was within its statutory remit and expertise. The interference with Article 10 rights was justified and proportionate.

Parties
Claimant: Star China Media Limited; Defendant: The Office of Communications
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 December 2022
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Broadcasting Code Compliance, Impartiality in News Reporting, Financial Penalties, Freedom of Expression, Proportionality Analysis

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Star China Media Limited

Claimant

The Office of Communications

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the financial penalty imposed by OFCOM was disproportionate given the revocation of Star China’s licence
  2. 2 Whether OFCOM’s decision constituted an unjustified interference with Article 10 rights
  3. 3 Whether OFCOM properly considered the nature and seriousness of the breaches, compliance history, and audience expectations

Ratio Decidendi

The penalty imposed by OFCOM was not disproportionate or unlawful; general deterrence justified the penalty even after licence revocation, and OFCOM’s assessment of seriousness, compliance history, and harm was within its statutory remit and expertise. The interference with Article 10 rights was justified and proportionate.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Star China’s application for judicial review is dismissed