Howard, R (on the application of) v The Official Receiver
The Official Receiver, in deciding to revoke the Debt Relief Order, was exercising a judicial function within the meaning of paragraph 3 of Schedule 18 to the Equality Act 2010. Accordingly, the public sector equality duty under section 149 did not apply to the decision, and the Claimant's application for judicial review must be dismissed.
- Parties
- Claimant: Amanda Howard; Defendant: The Official Receiver
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Full Hearing
- Outcome
- Application for judicial review dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Function, Public Sector Equality Duty, Debt Relief Orders, Disability Discrimination, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amanda Howard
Claimant
The Official Receiver
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Full Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Official Receiver, in revoking a Debt Relief Order, was exercising a judicial function within the meaning of paragraph 3 of Schedule 18 to the Equality Act 2010, thereby excluding the public sector equality duty under section 149.
- 2 If not, whether the Official Receiver failed to comply with the public sector equality duty.
Ratio Decidendi
The Official Receiver, in deciding to revoke the Debt Relief Order, was exercising a judicial function within the meaning of paragraph 3 of Schedule 18 to the Equality Act 2010. Accordingly, the public sector equality duty under section 149 did not apply to the decision, and the Claimant's application for judicial review must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for judicial review dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment