Neil Herron & Parking Appeals Ltd, R (on the application of) v The Parking Adjudicator & Ors
A Controlled Parking Zone remains valid and enforceable despite minor or trivial irregularities in signage, provided that adequate information as to the parking restrictions is conveyed to motorists; strict literal compliance with every signage requirement is not necessary, and substantial compliance suffices unless the irregularity is such as to mislead or fail to inform the motorist.
- Parties
- Appellants: Neil Herron & Parking Appeals Limited; Respondent: The Parking Adjudicator; First Interested Party: Sunderland City Council; Second Interested Party: Secretary of State for Transport
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (appeal) / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Controlled Parking Zones (cpz), Traffic Regulation Orders (tro), Statutory Interpretation, Adequacy of Traffic Signage, De Minimis Principle, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Neil Herron & Parking Appeals Limited
Appellants
The Parking Adjudicator
Respondent
Sunderland City Council
First Interested Party
Secretary of State for Transport
Second Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (appeal) / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether irregularities in signage within a Controlled Parking Zone (CPZ) invalidate the CPZ and render penalty charge notices unenforceable
- 2 Whether strict or substantial compliance with statutory signage requirements is necessary for enforcement of parking restrictions
- 3 Whether the adequacy of information conveyed to motorists is the correct legal test for validity of parking restrictions
Ratio Decidendi
A Controlled Parking Zone remains valid and enforceable despite minor or trivial irregularities in signage, provided that adequate information as to the parking restrictions is conveyed to motorists; strict literal compliance with every signage requirement is not necessary, and substantial compliance suffices unless the irregularity is such as to mislead or fail to inform the motorist.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed; the decision of the lower court and the Parking Adjudicator is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment