Hackney Drivers Association Ltd, R (on the application of) v Parking Adjudicator & Anor
The penalty charge notice, when read as a whole, fairly conveyed the information required by Regulation 3(2)(b)(i) of the Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions (England) Representations and Appeals Regulations 2007. There was no misleading as to time limits for informal challenges, and the requirements of the regulation were met.
- Parties
- Claimant: Hackney Drivers Association Limited; Defendant: The Parking Adjudicator; Interested Party: Lancashire County Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Penalty Charge Notices, Statutory Compliance, Parking Enforcement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hackney Drivers Association Limited
Claimant
The Parking Adjudicator
Defendant
Lancashire County Council
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the penalty charge notice complied with regulation 3(2)(b)(i) of the Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions (England) Representations and Appeals Regulations 2007
Ratio Decidendi
The penalty charge notice, when read as a whole, fairly conveyed the information required by Regulation 3(2)(b)(i) of the Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions (England) Representations and Appeals Regulations 2007. There was no misleading as to time limits for informal challenges, and the requirements of the regulation were met.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Application for judicial review is dismissed
- Leave to appeal refused by the High Court; applicant may seek permission from the Court of Appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment