Hovenden, R (on the Application of) v The Parole Board [2014] EWHC 3738 (Admin) (20 October 2014)
The Parole Board applied the correct public protection test in its decision, and any infelicity of language in the opening paragraph did not affect the substance or legality of the decision.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 3738 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Kim Hovenden; Defendant: The Parole Board
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Parole, Public Protection Test, Judicial Review, Prisoner Release
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Parties
Kim Hovenden
Claimant
The Parole Board
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Parole Board applied the correct public protection test under section 225C(3) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 in refusing release
Ratio Decidendi
The Parole Board applied the correct public protection test in its decision, and any infelicity of language in the opening paragraph did not affect the substance or legality of the decision.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Claim for judicial review is dismissed
- Usual costs order not to be enforced without leave of the court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment