Tinney, R (on the application of) v The Parole Board
The Parole Board's decision was insufficiently reasoned as it failed to address the impact of the claimant's protected witness status, resettlement plan, and other relevant factors on the reduction of risk, thus not providing adequate reasons for refusing parole.
- Parties
- Claimant: Tinney; Defendant: The Parole Board
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment on Application to Quash Parole Board Decision
- Outcome
- Decision of the Parole Board quashed
- Legal Topics
- Parole, Judicial Review, Reasoning of Administrative Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tinney
Claimant
The Parole Board
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment on Application to Quash Parole Board Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Parole Board's refusal to grant parole was irrational or insufficiently reasoned
- 2 Whether the Parole Board failed to consider relevant factors regarding risk reduction
Ratio Decidendi
The Parole Board's decision was insufficiently reasoned as it failed to address the impact of the claimant's protected witness status, resettlement plan, and other relevant factors on the reduction of risk, thus not providing adequate reasons for refusing parole.
Court Disposition
Decision of the Parole Board quashed
Orders
- A new hearing before a differently constituted Parole Board panel with updated evidence to be arranged within four weeks on best endeavours.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment