Kitto, R (on the application of) v Parole Board & Anor
The Parole Board's decision was flawed because it relied on a non-existent risk (the university place being conditional on exam results), which materially affected the assessment of risk and invalidated the decision.
- Parties
- Claimant: Colin Eric Kitto; Respondent: The Parole Board; Respondent: The Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment on Merits After Oral Hearing
- Outcome
- decision quashed
- Legal Topics
- Parole, Judicial Review, Irrationality, Risk Assessment, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Colin Eric Kitto
Claimant
The Parole Board
Respondent
The Secretary of State for the Home Department
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment on Merits After Oral Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Parole Board's decision to refuse parole was irrational and based on a fundamental misinterpretation of material
- 2 Whether the Board properly considered the risk assessment and the claimant's university place
- 3 Whether the Board had a proper basis for concerns about the claimant residing with his mother
Ratio Decidendi
The Parole Board's decision was flawed because it relied on a non-existent risk (the university place being conditional on exam results), which materially affected the assessment of risk and invalidated the decision.
Court Disposition
decision quashed
Orders
- The Parole Board's decision is set aside.
- The matter is to be reconsidered by the Parole Board.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment