Hiscox Syndicates Ltd & Anor v The Pinnacle Ltd & Ors
Both claim and defence are reasonably arguable; balance of convenience favours granting variation to injunction subject to conditions ensuring adequate access and business interruption insurance/security.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Hiscox Syndicates Ltd.; Claimant: Hiscox plc; Defendant: The Pinnacle Ltd.; Defendant: The Pinnacle No.1 Ltd.; Defendant: Keltbray Ltd.; Defendant: Arab Investments Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 June 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Injunction Application / Interlocutory Hearing
- Outcome
- Variation to injunction granted subject to conditions; parties to draft order reflecting judgment and return for consequential matters.
- Legal Topics
- Public Nuisance, Private Nuisance, Frontager's Rights, Injunctions, Balance of Convenience, Business Interruption Insurance
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hiscox Syndicates Ltd.
Claimant
Hiscox plc
Claimant
The Pinnacle Ltd.
Defendant
The Pinnacle No.1 Ltd.
Defendant
Keltbray Ltd.
Defendant
Arab Investments Ltd.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Injunction Application / Interlocutory Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants' proposed variation to the injunction infringes the claimants' rights of access
- 2 Whether temporary obstruction of the highway constitutes public nuisance
- 3 Whether frontager's rights are inalienable and affected by the proposed works
Ratio Decidendi
Both claim and defence are reasonably arguable; balance of convenience favours granting variation to injunction subject to conditions ensuring adequate access and business interruption insurance/security.
Court Disposition
Variation to injunction granted subject to conditions; parties to draft order reflecting judgment and return for consequential matters.
Orders
- Defendants to provide and maintain alternative car park route (ACPR) with minimum width and footpath.
- Defendants to provide holding area for vehicle turnaround and three traffic marshals 24/7.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment